Mobile app development
One app taken from idea to the App Store and Google Play, through discovery, design, build, testing, release and improvement based on real use.
Most organizations need their app on both iPhone and Android, and maintaining two separate codebases doubles the work. Cross-platform frameworks let one team build and maintain a single codebase for both, with native code added only where an app needs it. We help you choose the right framework and build apps that still feel at home on each platform.
Hybrid and cross-platform app development means building one app that runs on both iOS and Android from a shared codebase. Instead of two teams writing the same features twice, one team builds them once, and the framework produces an app for each platform. Where an app needs something the framework cannot do, we add a small amount of native code.
We use this approach when it fits the app, not by default. Some apps are better native, and we will say so. See iOS app development and Android app development for those cases.
We also modernize older hybrid apps built with Cordova or earlier framework versions, moving them to supported technology without losing features or users.
Cross-platform development suits apps built around forms, lists, content, bookings, payments and workflows, which describes most customer and business apps. It lowers build and maintenance costs because features, fixes and tests are written once. It also makes it easier to keep both versions in step, so Android users are not left waiting for features iPhone users already have.
It is less suitable for apps that depend on intensive graphics, specialized hardware or new platform features the day they are released. In those cases native development, or a cross-platform app with more native modules, is the better call.
Cross-platform apps can share more than code between iOS and Android. With React Native, business logic, validation rules and API clients can be shared with a React web application; with a progressive web app, the same code serves the browser and the home screen. Shared design components keep the app consistent with your web platform, and one set of APIs serves every channel. This reduces duplicate work and keeps rules consistent wherever customers and staff use your services.
A shared codebase does not mean identical behaviour. iOS and Android users expect different navigation, back behaviour, dialogs and gestures, and we adapt the app where it matters. Every release is tested on real devices on both platforms, including accessibility with VoiceOver and TalkBack. Apps can be localized in English and French, and privacy disclosures for both stores are prepared from what the app actually collects.
Costs are planned release by release with estimates in CAD. Managed-service clients can include the app's backend in 24/7 monitoring and support, with response targets set in the service agreement. For the full path from idea to launch, see mobile app development.
The exact list is agreed in writing for each project. These are the usual deliverables and the usual boundaries.
Most delays in this kind of work come from access and decisions, not from the technical build. Knowing these early keeps the project predictable.
Each stage ends with something you can review before the next one starts.
Compare frameworks against your features, device needs, team skills and long-term support, and write down the choice.
Output: Framework recommendation.
Design once, then adapt navigation, controls and gestures where iOS and Android users expect different behaviour.
Output: Approved designs and prototype.
Build shared code in short iterations, adding native modules for features the framework cannot reach directly.
Output: Test builds for both platforms.
Test on real devices on both platforms, check accessibility, then release to both stores or deploy privately.
Output: Released apps.
Upgrade the framework on a planned schedule and keep native modules aligned with new operating system versions.
Output: Maintenance plan and regular updates.
We do not publish package prices. Each estimate is based on an agreed scope, in Canadian dollars, with taxes shown separately. These are the things that move the number most:
For most business and customer apps, modern frameworks perform well and users do not notice a difference. Apps with heavy animation, 3D graphics or intensive processing can benefit from native code, and we will tell you if yours is one of them.
Both are mature. React Native suits teams that already work in JavaScript or TypeScript and React, and can share logic with a React web app. Flutter gives very consistent visuals across platforms and strong performance. .NET MAUI suits organizations built around Microsoft and C#. We recommend based on your app and your team.
Older hybrid apps, built with tools such as Cordova or Ionic, run a web page inside an app shell. Cross-platform frameworks such as Flutter and React Native draw native-quality interfaces. We still use web-based approaches, such as Ionic with Capacitor or a progressive web app, when sharing code with a website matters most.
Yes. Frameworks provide plugins for common features, and we write small native modules for anything they do not cover.
By upgrading regularly rather than once every few years. We plan framework upgrades into maintenance and keep native code small and documented, so each upgrade stays manageable.
One app taken from idea to the App Store and Google Play, through discovery, design, build, testing, release and improvement based on real use.
Native iPhone and iPad apps built in Swift and SwiftUI, released on the App Store or distributed privately to company-managed devices.
Native Android apps in Kotlin for phones, tablets and rugged devices, published on Google Play or deployed privately through Android Enterprise.
Tell us what the app should do, who will use it and who will maintain it. We will reply to arrange a conversation about the right framework before anything is priced.